HomeresearchMultiple Sclerosis and the Microbiome - the Twin Study

Multiple Sclerosis and the Microbiome – the Twin Study

-

Today we saw a patient with progressive multiple sclerosis (MS) for more than 30 years. Unfortunately, she is now severely disabled and confined to a wheelchair. Everything started about six weeks after a severe episode of food poisoning.

Her current food allergy profile (grade 3-4 reactions to virtually every food tested) indicates an extremely active leaky gut. Neither Tobias nor I have ever seen such a dramatic IgE antigen profile. There is virtually no food that does not trigger an inflammatory reaction.

None of the intensive and professionally performed neuromodulation treatments she previously received (at another SOZO Center) produced any improvement whatsoever. This is highly unusual. In our own practice we have never encountered a patient in whom we could not achieve at least some degree of improvement.

This case immediately reminded me of a remarkable study that I came across a few months ago. In my opinion, it provides some of the strongest evidence so far that an intestinal bacterial infection may act as a trigger for multiple sclerosis.

How could that possibly work? Can gut bacteria really trigger MS?

The venous blood vessels of the intestinal tract are largely valveless, and the same is true for much of the lymphatic drainage. It is therefore easy to imagine that under conditions of increased intra-abdominal pressure—such as coughing, bending over, or straining—retrograde venous flow from the intestinal circulation toward the spinal venous system may occur. In this way, bacterial exotoxins, lipopolysaccharides (LPS) from bacterial cell walls, or perhaps even entire bacteria could potentially reach the spinal cord and trigger local neuroinflammation.

Twin Study – A Major Milestone

A few months ago I came across a remarkable study on Twitter.

The investigators examined 81 pairs of identical twins in which only one twin had developed multiple sclerosis. This elegant design allowed the researchers to control for genetic background as well as many environmental factors.

The Study

Yoon H, Gerdes LA, Beigel F, et al.

Multiple sclerosis and gut microbiota: Lachnospiraceae from the ileum of MS twins trigger MS-like disease in germfree transgenic mice—An unbiased functional study.

What did the researchers do?

  • Studied 81 pairs of identical twins, with MS affecting only one twin in each pair.
  • Performed comprehensive analyses of the gut microbiome.
  • In four twin pairs they additionally obtained terminal ileum biopsies, because this is one of the key sites where intestinal immune activation occurs.
  • The intestinal microbiota was then transferred into germ-free transgenic mice genetically predisposed to develop experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis (EAE), the standard animal model of MS.

The most important finding

Among more than fifty bacterial taxa, two members of the Lachnospiraceae family clearly stood out:

  • Lachnoclostridium (formerly classified within the Clostridia group)
  • Eisenbergiella tayi

These bacteria were significantly more abundant in the twins with MS. More importantly, they were also detected in the recipient mice, which subsequently developed an MS-like autoimmune disease.

Why is this so important?

Previous microbiome studies had mainly shown one thing:

“Patients with multiple sclerosis have a different gut microbiome.”

This study went one decisive step further.

  • Genetically almost identical human subjects
  • Functional proof in an animal model
  • Identification of specific bacterial candidates

This represents one of the strongest pieces of evidence available so far that certain intestinal bacteria may actively contribute to the development of multiple sclerosis. While this still does not prove causality in humans, it goes far beyond a simple association.

The Clostridia Connection

Interestingly, the bacteria identified were not Clostridium perfringens or one of the classic pathogenic Clostridia. Instead, the researchers identified Lachnoclostridium, a member of the Lachnospiraceae family that evolved taxonomically from the former Clostridia group. They also identified Eisenbergiella tayi.

The experimental design was particularly impressive:

  • 81 pairs of identical twins, with MS present in only one twin.
  • Bacterial communities from the terminal ileum were analyzed.
  • The identified bacterial populations were transferred into germ-free transgenic mice genetically predisposed to develop EAE.
  • The recipient mice developed experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis (EAE) significantly more often when they received bacteria derived from the MS twins.

The most exciting part came next.

The investigators isolated individual bacterial candidates and ultimately identified two organisms as the principal disease drivers:

  • Lachnoclostridium species
  • Eisenbergiella tayi

 

These two bacteria alone were sufficient to reproduce susceptibility to disease in the mice. The animals developed:

  • markedly increased Th17 cells
  • stronger autoimmune responses directed against myelin
  • a substantially higher incidence of clinical EAE.

This is important because, for the first time, several of the Bradford Hill criteria for causality are at least partially fulfilled:

  • Association in humans
  • Genetic control through identical twins
  • A biologically plausible mechanism
  • Functional reproducibility in an animal model

Altogether, this provides substantially stronger evidence than most previous microbiome association studies.

Lachnoclostridium belongs to the anaerobic Firmicutes (formerly classified within the Clostridia group). It therefore seems highly worthwhile to investigate whether these bacteria can be selectively targeted—for example by bacteriophages, highly specific antibiotics, competitive probiotics, or fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT). The present study, however, did not address therapeutic interventions. Its major contribution is demonstrating that specific intestinal bacteria may be more than innocent bystanders: in genetically susceptible hosts they may actively initiate autoimmune disease.

 

Progressive MS appears to be a fundamentally different disease from relapsing-remitting MS

At least that is what we experience in daily clinical practice.

Progressive MS responds only minimally to the Coimbra Protocol, which often works remarkably well in patients with relapsing-remitting MS. Likewise, conventional brain-directed neuromodulation has generally produced disappointing results in these patients.

This observation also fits remarkably well with MRI findings. In patients with chronic progressive MS, follow-up brain MRI scans frequently reveal very few new lesions, even though the patients continue to deteriorate clinically.

From a practical point of view, this has gradually changed my own understanding of the disease.

Today I increasingly regard chronic progressive MS as primarily a disease of the spinal cord.

Only after we started directing neuromodulation toward the spinal cord itself did we begin to see meaningful clinical improvements.

These improvements are rarely dramatic and often do not last as long as we would like. It frequently seems as though our regenerative interventions are gradually overtaken by the underlying progressive disease process.

Nevertheless, the concept that specific pathogenic intestinal bacteria may continuously drive disease activity opens an entirely new therapeutic avenue that deserves serious investigation.

 

Progressive versus relapsing MS – additional studies and current models

 

Progressive MS versus Relapsing-Remitting MS

Recent review articles increasingly distinguish these two forms of MS as biologically different disease processes.

Relapsing-remitting MS

  • Predominantly driven by the adaptive immune system
  • Strong involvement of Th17 cells
  • Th17 activity can often be markedly suppressed by high-dose vitamin D as used in the Coimbra Protocol.
  • Formation of new inflammatory lesions

Progressive MS

  • Persistent activation of microglia
  • Intrathecal B-cell activity
  • Chronic compartmentalized inflammation
  • Smoldering lesions
  • Progressive neurodegeneration

Within this framework, the intestinal microbiome may not directly cause disease progression itself. Rather, it could provide the persistent immunological stimulus that continuously activates microglia and maintains chronic inflammation within the central nervous system.

The bacteria identified in the twin study appear capable of triggering MS, but the precise molecular mechanisms remain unknown.

 

Results of an extensive AI-assisted PubMed search

After multiple rounds of literature searches, I was unable to identify any published study demonstrating that a naturally occurring bacterial species can independently induce a genuine primary progressive (PPMS) or secondary progressive (SPMS) MS-like disease through molecular mimicry or bacterial exotoxins alone.

However, three distinct lines of research come remarkably close to this concept.

The strongest current candidate remains Clostridium perfringens producing epsilon toxin (ETX), although the proposed mechanism differs from the classic Th17 molecular mimicry hypothesis.

Candidate 1: Clostridium perfringens and epsilon toxin

Why this mechanism is particularly intriguing

Epsilon toxin (ETX) is a pore-forming exotoxin produced by toxinogenic strains of Clostridium perfringens. Experimental studies have shown that it can:

  • Damage the blood-brain barrier and other neurovascular barriers
  • Bind to MAL (Myelin and Lymphocyte Protein)
  • Damage oligodendrocytes and myelin-rich structures
  • Induce focal vascular permeability, edema, and neurological lesions in animal models

A 2024 study demonstrated that ETX forms membrane pores in MAL-expressing cells and stimulates the release of extracellular vesicles containing MAL together with ETX oligomers. This provides strong evidence for a direct interaction between the toxin, MAL, and myelin-associated membrane structures.

Importantly, the toxin does not “label” myelin immunologically. Instead, it appears to bind preferentially to MAL-containing myelin-associated cell membranes.

 

What argues against an established causal role in MS?

A French research group led by Marie-Lise Gougeon and Michel Popoff investigated antibodies directed against epsilon toxin (ETX) in 100 untreated patients with relapsing-remitting MS and 90 healthy controls.

Although ETX-reactive IgM antibodies were found more frequently in patients with MS, the antibody pattern did not support previous exposure to epsilon toxin. Instead, the authors concluded that the observed immune response most likely represents cross-reactivity with an as yet unidentified autoantigen, and they explicitly argued against a proven causal relationship between ETX exposure and multiple sclerosis.

It is also important to recognize several limitations of this study:

  • Only relapsing-remitting MS was investigated, not PPMS or SPMS.
  • No longitudinal relationship with disease progression was demonstrated.
  • No chronic ETX exposure model reproducing progressive MS has been established.
  • No slowly expanding lesions or compartmentalized CNS inflammation were reproduced experimentally.

 

Overall assessment

  • Biological plausibility: High
  • Direct evidence for PPMS/SPMS: Low

At present, ETX remains perhaps the most compelling naturally occurring candidate capable of linking an intestinal source, disruption of biological barriers, and direct myelin injury. Nevertheless, a true model of chronic progressive MS has not yet been demonstrated.

 

Candidate 2: Natural bacterial molecular mimicry

 

The Basel study

A study published in 2025 demonstrated that bacteria genetically engineered to express the MOG35-55 peptide on their surface activated MOG-specific T cells and B cells within the intestinal immune system. After additional administration of pertussis toxin, these animals developed accelerated spinal EAE.

This represents an elegant proof of concept showing that bacterial antigen presentation can trigger autoimmune responses directed against myelin.

However, several important limitations remain:

  • The MOG peptide was artificially introduced into the bacteria.
  • No naturally occurring bacterial mimotope was identified.
  • The disease model required additional disruption of immune barriers.
  • The model did not reproduce genuine PPMS or SPMS.
  • Persistent microglial activation and smoldering lesion pathology were not demonstrated.

Thus, this work establishes that bacterial molecular mimicry is biologically feasible, but it does not demonstrate that a naturally occurring bacterial species causes progressive MS.

 

Current knowledge regarding natural bacterial mimotopes

The recent literature contains numerous publications discussing microbial cross-reactivity in MS. However, these studies mainly involve:

  • Viral mimotopes, especially Epstein-Barr virus (EBV)
  • Theoretical or bioinformatic bacterial sequence homologies
  • Antibody cross-reactivity without functional disease transfer
  • No convincing association specifically with PPMS or SPMS

A review published in 2026 discusses lessons learned from post-streptococcal autoimmune disease as a possible model for MS. While conceptually interesting, it does not identify a bacterial species capable of experimentally inducing progressive MS.

 

Overall assessment

  • Mechanistic plausibility: High
  • Naturally identified bacterial species: Not yet
  • Direct evidence for PPMS/SPMS: None

 

Candidate 3: Bacteria enriched in progressive MS

Clostridium bolteae

Several microbiome studies in patients with progressive MS have reported increased abundance of Clostridium bolteae together with members of the Enterobacteriaceae family. Both groups have been associated with pro-inflammatory immune responses and enhanced Th17 activation.

This observation is clinically intriguing because patients with progressive MS appear to harbor a microbial composition that differs from that seen in relapsing-remitting MS.

However, the limitations remain substantial:

  • Purely observational association
  • No isolated bacterial transfer reproducing PPMS- or SPMS-like disease
  • No identified MOG, MBP, or PLP mimotope
  • No identified neurotoxic exotoxin
  • Potential confounding by medication, disability, age, diet, and intestinal transit time

 

Lachnoclostridium and Eisenbergiella tayi

The twin study provides functional evidence that ileal microbiota from patients with MS can promote autoimmune disease and identifies Lachnoclostridium together with Eisenbergiella tayi as particularly promising candidates.

However, the study does not identify:

  • A specific exotoxin
  • A molecular mimotope
  • A PPMS or SPMS disease model
  • Chronic progressive neurodegeneration
  • Direct binding to myelin

Nevertheless, these organisms remain among the most compelling bacterial candidates because their pathogenic potential has been supported not only by microbiome association studies but also by functional transfer into germ-free autoimmune-prone animals.

 

Important caveat: Chronic EAE is not the same as progressive MS

Current mouse models may not fully replicate human multiple sclerosis.

A major methodological issue in the literature concerns the frequent use of the term chronic EAE.

The widely used MOG35-55-induced EAE model in C57BL/6 mice produces:

  • Persistent paralysis
  • Spinal cord inflammation
  • Demyelination
  • Axonal injury
  • Sustained microglial activation

For this reason it is often described as a chronic model and occasionally even as a model of progressive MS.

However, disease induction is entirely artificial and requires:

  • Myelin antigen
  • Complete Freund’s adjuvant
  • Pertussis toxin

This differs fundamentally from spontaneous primary progressive MS. The resulting chronic disease largely reflects the aftermath of experimentally induced peripheral autoimmunity and reproduces only part of the compartmentalized CNS inflammation, meningeal B-cell aggregates, and slowly expanding lesions characteristic of human PPMS and SPMS.

A biomarker study published in 2025 compared relapsing-remitting and chronic EAE and demonstrated markedly elevated concentrations of neurofilament light chain (NfL) and GFAP in the chronic model. However, no bacterial trigger was identified.

 

Other models that may better reflect PPMS and SPMS

Theiler’s murine encephalomyelitis

Theiler’s murine encephalomyelitis virus (TMEV) produces an initial infection followed by chronic inflammatory demyelination, microgliosis, astrogliosis, and progressive neurological disability. This model is sometimes regarded as more closely resembling progressive MS.

One study demonstrated that probiotics in this model:

  • Reduced motor disability
  • Decreased microgliosis and astrogliosis
  • Reduced leukocyte infiltration into the central nervous system
  • Suppressed Th17 activity
  • Increased butyrate and acetate concentrations

These findings support an important role for the intestinal microbiome in chronic progressive neuroinflammation. However, the study did not identify a single bacterial species capable of initiating the disease.

 

NOD mice with chronic progressive EAE

Following MOG immunization, NOD mice can develop a prolonged progressive disease course characterized by demyelination, axonal loss, and rims of activated macrophages that more closely resemble chronic active lesions in human MS.

However, the trigger in this model is still artificial MOG immunization rather than a naturally occurring bacterium.

 

Research trajectories of the relevant scientific groups

The Popoff-Gougeon group

The research program led by Michel Popoff has focused primarily on:

  • ETX structure and toxin biology
  • MAL as the cellular receptor
  • Disruption of biological barriers and injury to myelin
  • Serological cross-reactivity in patients with MS

This line of research appears to be moving away from a simple theory of direct ETX infection and toward the question of whether ETX antibodies may recognize another, potentially myelin-associated autoantigen.

This is conceptually fascinating. ETX might exert direct toxic effects, or it could function immunologically as a mimic of a MAL- or myelin-associated antigen. However, functional proof for this hypothesis is still lacking.

 

The Wekerle-Peters-Gerdes group

This research trajectory has developed through several successive stages:

  • MS-discordant twin cohorts
  • Transfer of complete microbiota
  • Use of germ-free autoimmune-prone mice
  • Analysis of the ileum rather than stool alone
  • Identification of candidate members of the Lachnospiraceae family

The logical next step would be to investigate the functional relevance of:

  • Secreted bacterial proteins
  • Bacterial surface antigens
  • Microbial metabolites
  • HLA-binding molecular mimotopes
  • Direct activation of Th17 cells or B cells

To date, I have not been able to identify a published follow-up study in which a specific toxin or molecular mimotope was identified.

 

The Weiner-Cox group

The group led by Howard Weiner and Laura Cox has specifically investigated the microbiome in patients with progressive MS.

Among the alterations identified were changes involving:

  • Enterobacteriaceae
  • Clostridium bolteae
  • Akkermansia
  • Butyrate-producing bacteria

This research program currently provides one of the strongest clinical links to progressive MS, but it has not yet demonstrated causality for any single bacterial species.

 

Overall assessment

The candidate that best fits my gut-toxin theory derived from clinical practice

Clostridium perfringens and epsilon toxin

  • Naturally occurring exotoxin
  • MAL receptor
  • Direct affinity for myelin-associated membranes
  • Effects on oligodendrocytes and biological barriers
  • But no proven causal role in PPMS or SPMS

 

The candidates most strongly associated with progressive MS in humans

Clostridium bolteae and Enterobacteriaceae

  • Enriched in patients with progressive MS
  • Associated with pro-inflammatory immune activity
  • Potentially capable of promoting Th17 responses
  • But currently supported only by association studies

 

The strongest functional candidates for MS-triggering intestinal bacteria

Lachnoclostridium and Eisenbergiella tayi

  • Identified in identical twins discordant for MS
  • Functional disease transfer in a genetically predisposed mouse model
  • But not a PPMS or SPMS model
  • The underlying mechanism remains unknown

 

The strongest evidence for molecular mimicry

Genetically engineered bacteria presenting MOG

  • Clear functional proof of principle
  • Activation of myelin-specific T cells and B cells
  • Induction of spinal cord inflammation
  • But no naturally occurring bacterium and no specific model of progressive disease

 

 

Conclusion

Based on the currently available evidence, the most plausible hypothesis for bacterial involvement in chronic progressive multiple sclerosis is not a single proven pathogen, but rather a two- or three-hit model:

  • An intestinal bacterium or bacterial antigen induces persistent myelin-specific or pro-inflammatory immune activation.
  • A bacterial toxin or inflammatory mediator damages the intestinal barrier, the blood-brain barrier, or myelin-associated cells.
  • Within an already vulnerable central nervous system, the inflammatory process becomes self-sustaining through microglia, macrophages, complement activation, and compartmentalized B-cell-driven inflammation.

Within this conceptual framework, the following candidates currently deserve particular attention:

  • Toxin-producing Clostridium perfringens strains and epsilon toxin (ETX)
  • Lachnoclostridium
  • Eisenbergiella tayi
  • Clostridium bolteae
  • Enterobacteriaceae
  • Naturally occurring MOG-, MBP-, or PLP-mimotopes expressed by these bacterial species

 

The critical experiment that is still missing would be long-term mono-colonization or combined colonization of a progressive EAE or NOD mouse model without artificial MOG immunization, followed by detailed investigation of chronic active lesion borders, microglial activation, complement activation, axonal degeneration, and long-term disease progression.

Until such an experiment has been performed, the concept that bacteria contribute to PPMS or SPMS remains a biologically plausible and scientifically well-supported hypothesis, but not yet a proven mechanism.

 

 

A practical challenge for clinicians

From my perspective, one obvious goal is to develop an effective therapeutic strategy directed against pathogenic intestinal Clostridia and related bacterial communities.

Tobias Eisenkolb, the naturopath working in my practice, has achieved remarkably encouraging results in many patients suffering from chronic fatigue syndromes and other long-standing, unexplained illnesses. These are often individuals who have spent years consulting physician after physician, while conventional investigations repeatedly reported “normal findings” and no treatment produced lasting improvement.

His diagnostic approach combines a specialized urinary metabolite analysis with targeted microbiome testing. Based on these findings, he frequently applies relatively simple antimicrobial strategies—for example lemon balm tincture in selected patients with suspected chronic viral activation or oregano oil in patients with microbiome patterns suggesting overgrowth of Clostridia—combined with intensive detoxification protocols intended to reduce Herxheimer reactions.

In our own practice, these approaches have produced sufficiently convincing clinical results that I now routinely refer this entire group of patients directly to Tobias instead of managing them myself.

Fortunately, Tobias will soon also be joining our Brain Center in Vienna.

Our goal over the coming months is to develop a structured and clinically effective treatment program specifically targeting the intestinal microbiome.

Unfortunately, Tobias is already fully booked in our Vöcklabruck practice for the remainder of this year.

However, appointments may still be available at our Brain Center in Vienna.

Google CENSORSHIP!

Google censors my homepage quite a bit, sometimes I am not even able to find my articles on Google. So please sign up for the newsletter and share it with friends or via Facebook and use the search function on my website. Follow me on Twitter, where I also announce important articles.